<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Pillars: Digital Equivalents of Opposable Thumbs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/04/27/four-pillars-digital-equivalents-of-opposable-thumbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/04/27/four-pillars-digital-equivalents-of-opposable-thumbs/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Confused Of Calcutta &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Four Pillars: On enterprises and complexity bias</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/04/27/four-pillars-digital-equivalents-of-opposable-thumbs/comment-page-1/#comment-2438</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused Of Calcutta &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Four Pillars: On enterprises and complexity bias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=47#comment-2438</guid>
		<description>[...] The kernel for this post was a comment made by Jeff Nolan (Hi Jeff!) on apparent complexity biases in enterprise software selection/development, and a follow-up by Jeff Weinberger, both relating to one of my recent posts. And before I commented further, I felt it was appropriate to link back to an earlier post of mine that new readers may not have seen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The kernel for this post was a comment made by Jeff Nolan (Hi Jeff!) on apparent complexity biases in enterprise software selection/development, and a follow-up by Jeff Weinberger, both relating to one of my recent posts. And before I commented further, I felt it was appropriate to link back to an earlier post of mine that new readers may not have seen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/04/27/four-pillars-digital-equivalents-of-opposable-thumbs/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 06:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=47#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Comment resurrected from coComment:

In my view their are two things that will drive your &quot;tomorrow&quot; - enshrining net neutrality (under threat in the US) and reaching a critical threshold of confidence about identity - confidence that our own identity is sufficiently &quot;unstealable&quot; and the corollary that we can be sufficiently sure of the identities of those we deal with on the net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment resurrected from coComment:</p>
<p>In my view their are two things that will drive your &#8220;tomorrow&#8221; &#8211; enshrining net neutrality (under threat in the US) and reaching a critical threshold of confidence about identity &#8211; confidence that our own identity is sufficiently &#8220;unstealable&#8221; and the corollary that we can be sufficiently sure of the identities of those we deal with on the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
