<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Pillars: The Power of Words: Lakoff meets Surowiecki?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/06/04/four-pillars-the-power-of-words-lakoff-meets-surowiecki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/06/04/four-pillars-the-power-of-words-lakoff-meets-surowiecki/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/06/04/four-pillars-the-power-of-words-lakoff-meets-surowiecki/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/06/04/four-pillars-the-power-of-words-lakoff-meets-surowiecki/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>IMVHO most financial media with objectivity as a goal (WSJ, Reuters, etc.) tend to get most of the story explaining the outliers correct, although their lapses do create interesting market opportunities where Tetlock&#039;s observation about reversion to fundamentals is more pronounced.  

One should distinguish between the objective media and the entertainment segment (e.g. Mad Money) which is clearly trying to generate a market impact (and doing quite well in that regard).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMVHO most financial media with objectivity as a goal (WSJ, Reuters, etc.) tend to get most of the story explaining the outliers correct, although their lapses do create interesting market opportunities where Tetlock&#8217;s observation about reversion to fundamentals is more pronounced.  </p>
<p>One should distinguish between the objective media and the entertainment segment (e.g. Mad Money) which is clearly trying to generate a market impact (and doing quite well in that regard).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/06/04/four-pillars-the-power-of-words-lakoff-meets-surowiecki/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 07:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2006/06/04/four-pillars-the-power-of-words-lakoff-meets-surowiecki/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Taleb on this one: here he is explaining how journalists fit post hoc explanations....

http://www.smartmoney.com/theproshop/index.cfm?story=20051110&amp;pgnum=2

IMHO, most journos are lazy and wilfully ignorant. I live among them in North London, and I&#039;m constantly shocked by their lack of curiosity, and readiness to peddle their own unexamined prejudices.
Recently, the Evening Standard city editor irritated me...

http://etrading.wordpress.com/2006/05/30/hello-world/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Taleb on this one: here he is explaining how journalists fit post hoc explanations&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/theproshop/index.cfm?story=20051110&#038;pgnum=2" rel="nofollow">http://www.smartmoney.com/theproshop/index.cfm?story=20051110&#038;pgnum=2</a></p>
<p>IMHO, most journos are lazy and wilfully ignorant. I live among them in North London, and I&#8217;m constantly shocked by their lack of curiosity, and readiness to peddle their own unexamined prejudices.<br />
Recently, the Evening Standard city editor irritated me&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://etrading.wordpress.com/2006/05/30/hello-world/" rel="nofollow">http://etrading.wordpress.com/2006/05/30/hello-world/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

