<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On features and bugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/01/30/on-features-and-bugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/01/30/on-features-and-bugs/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tb</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/01/30/on-features-and-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-94322</link>
		<dc:creator>tb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/01/30/on-features-and-bugs/#comment-94322</guid>
		<description>flickr is another great example of this, and twitter is  too in that a company&#039;s side project became it&#039;s main focus - although twitter is even more interesting in that it&#039;s succeeded in spite of being incredibly buggy and unreliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flickr is another great example of this, and twitter is  too in that a company&#8217;s side project became it&#8217;s main focus &#8211; although twitter is even more interesting in that it&#8217;s succeeded in spite of being incredibly buggy and unreliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/01/30/on-features-and-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-93883</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/01/30/on-features-and-bugs/#comment-93883</guid>
		<description>Interesting line of thought.

Make the product fit for someone. Anyone. But make it fit. Work with the customer. Keep it open, and you will find that other &quot;untargeted&quot; customers will follow. There goes the concept of channels....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting line of thought.</p>
<p>Make the product fit for someone. Anyone. But make it fit. Work with the customer. Keep it open, and you will find that other &#8220;untargeted&#8221; customers will follow. There goes the concept of channels&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dodds</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/01/30/on-features-and-bugs/comment-page-1/#comment-93873</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/01/30/on-features-and-bugs/#comment-93873</guid>
		<description>Coincidentally, I mused yesterday on my blog about the &quot;unintended&quot; effects of marketing with specific reference to the Boston security alerts caused by urban spam for a TV show.

In similar vein, you will be aware of the software packages  targetted at &quot;small businesses&quot; that were rejected by them but fund great success and take-up by small dpeartments within big businesses because they were more manageable than the company-wide systems.

The bottom line is I think increasingly to make something effective at meeting a specific type of need and then letting the audience decide or co-create the actual manifestation of that need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidentally, I mused yesterday on my blog about the &#8220;unintended&#8221; effects of marketing with specific reference to the Boston security alerts caused by urban spam for a TV show.</p>
<p>In similar vein, you will be aware of the software packages  targetted at &#8220;small businesses&#8221; that were rejected by them but fund great success and take-up by small dpeartments within big businesses because they were more manageable than the company-wide systems.</p>
<p>The bottom line is I think increasingly to make something effective at meeting a specific type of need and then letting the audience decide or co-create the actual manifestation of that need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

