<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: two webs or one?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:20:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alan p</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/comment-page-1/#comment-146122</link>
		<dc:creator>alan p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 09:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/#comment-146122</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea......I think in fact its more complex than that. 

There are different types of online social networks (ie different topologies and operating dynamics) and they do have different roles, just like offline. 

And being human, we have multiple complex interactions with multiple people - in fact we may use different networks to interact with the same person depending on context.  

I recall a fascinating piece of research I saw while working with BT, showing that the same person uses different types of transaction (mobile, landline, email) for different message types

Likewise, I note that there are differences in various social networks depending on purpose - blogs, real time chatroom, asymmetric forums, asymmetric &quot;write on my profile wall&quot; systems, avatar drivem 3D worlds etc. 
 
So...a social web and an info web. Too simple, not nearly nuanced enough - we publisg Broadstuff (Our blog) on the web, on Facebook, and on Twitter - different types of consumption, different audiences

(In fact on Facebook alone there are many finely nuanced types of interactions)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea&#8230;&#8230;I think in fact its more complex than that. </p>
<p>There are different types of online social networks (ie different topologies and operating dynamics) and they do have different roles, just like offline. </p>
<p>And being human, we have multiple complex interactions with multiple people &#8211; in fact we may use different networks to interact with the same person depending on context.  </p>
<p>I recall a fascinating piece of research I saw while working with BT, showing that the same person uses different types of transaction (mobile, landline, email) for different message types</p>
<p>Likewise, I note that there are differences in various social networks depending on purpose &#8211; blogs, real time chatroom, asymmetric forums, asymmetric &#8220;write on my profile wall&#8221; systems, avatar drivem 3D worlds etc. </p>
<p>So&#8230;a social web and an info web. Too simple, not nearly nuanced enough &#8211; we publisg Broadstuff (Our blog) on the web, on Facebook, and on Twitter &#8211; different types of consumption, different audiences</p>
<p>(In fact on Facebook alone there are many finely nuanced types of interactions)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/comment-page-1/#comment-144421</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 21:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/#comment-144421</guid>
		<description>Sounds a good idea, I will get it implemented. Rgds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds a good idea, I will get it implemented. Rgds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jd long</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/comment-page-1/#comment-143864</link>
		<dc:creator>jd long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/#comment-143864</guid>
		<description>JP, On a tangential note, do you have an RSS feed for comments? I feel like I am missing some conversation because I only see the posts in Google Reader.  Sean Park&#039;s blog has a feed for posts and another for comments. It makes tracking the conversations easier. 

-JD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP, On a tangential note, do you have an RSS feed for comments? I feel like I am missing some conversation because I only see the posts in Google Reader.  Sean Park&#8217;s blog has a feed for posts and another for comments. It makes tracking the conversations easier. </p>
<p>-JD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/comment-page-1/#comment-138923</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 20:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/#comment-138923</guid>
		<description>I always make it a point to read commenters&#039; blogs wherever I have that information. Helps me discover new blogs and allows me a better perspective on the comment. Welcome to the conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always make it a point to read commenters&#8217; blogs wherever I have that information. Helps me discover new blogs and allows me a better perspective on the comment. Welcome to the conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Strauss</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/comment-page-1/#comment-138897</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Strauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 18:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/05/29/two-webs-or-one/#comment-138897</guid>
		<description>Thank you for noticing. I agree with you totally about keeping Cluetrain alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for noticing. I agree with you totally about keeping Cluetrain alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
