<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Musing about cricket and Google and Cricinfo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unwanted records &#124; confused of calcutta</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-172465</link>
		<dc:creator>Unwanted records &#124; confused of calcutta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-172465</guid>
		<description>[...] 513 for 7, four runs behind 2nd spot and 11 runs behind 1st spot; if you interested, I published the top 10 such scores in this post. And it made me think, they didn&#8217;t really want that record. For sure Karthik and Tendulkar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 513 for 7, four runs behind 2nd spot and 11 runs behind 1st spot; if you interested, I published the top 10 such scores in this post. And it made me think, they didn&#8217;t really want that record. For sure Karthik and Tendulkar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Butler</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-171563</link>
		<dc:creator>David Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-171563</guid>
		<description>Law 24 states that a bowler must inform the umpire if he decides to bowl with his &#039;wrong&#039; hand. But RH batsmen can play LH and vice versa, the so-called reverse sweep. This is unfair. 
One consequence is that if a ball pitches an inch outside the leg stump - which has now become the off stump - the batsman can&#039;t be out lbw. 
Madness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law 24 states that a bowler must inform the umpire if he decides to bowl with his &#8216;wrong&#8217; hand. But RH batsmen can play LH and vice versa, the so-called reverse sweep. This is unfair.<br />
One consequence is that if a ball pitches an inch outside the leg stump &#8211; which has now become the off stump &#8211; the batsman can&#8217;t be out lbw.<br />
Madness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-168559</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 07:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-168559</guid>
		<description>I am not pessimistic by nature, but I am old enough to remember India being bowled out for 42 sometime in the late sixties or early seventies. I even remember the roy ullyett cartoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not pessimistic by nature, but I am old enough to remember India being bowled out for 42 sometime in the late sixties or early seventies. I even remember the roy ullyett cartoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shripriya</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-168523</link>
		<dc:creator>Shripriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-168523</guid>
		<description>Ah, a day brings so much clarity :) It will be good for India to notch up the rare &quot;away&quot; test win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, a day brings so much clarity :) It will be good for India to notch up the rare &#8220;away&#8221; test win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-168296</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-168296</guid>
		<description>Sure Kamran, I will go take a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure Kamran, I will go take a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-168290</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-168290</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of the usual Red answer to the three teams that come from Merseyside: Liverpool; Tranmere; Liverpool Reserves

I&#039;d actually discounted the Tie, and allowed for the other 3 outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of the usual Red answer to the three teams that come from Merseyside: Liverpool; Tranmere; Liverpool Reserves</p>
<p>I&#8217;d actually discounted the Tie, and allowed for the other 3 outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamrul hasan</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-168288</link>
		<dc:creator>kamrul hasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-168288</guid>
		<description>dear blogger i am giving live scorecard. go to my blog and visit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear blogger i am giving live scorecard. go to my blog and visit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Sayers</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-168264</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Sayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-168264</guid>
		<description>JP, are you discounting the possibility of an England win? I prefer to believe all four results are still possible :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP, are you discounting the possibility of an England win? I prefer to believe all four results are still possible :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-168220</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-168220</guid>
		<description>I must be masochistic. I&#039;d rather see the wicket stay a run-feast for a day, then a complete nightmare on the fifth day, so much so that we enter the final session on Tuesday with all three results possible. Tall order maybe, but that to me is cricket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must be masochistic. I&#8217;d rather see the wicket stay a run-feast for a day, then a complete nightmare on the fifth day, so much so that we enter the final session on Tuesday with all three results possible. Tall order maybe, but that to me is cricket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shripriya</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/comment-page-1/#comment-168214</link>
		<dc:creator>Shripriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/07/29/musing-about-cricket-and-google-and-cricinfo/#comment-168214</guid>
		<description>Winning this one will not be easy either. Clearly England will not win, but I think a draw is the most likely.

Watching England bat at the end of day three, it was clear that unless the pitch starts to crumble or the batsmen make mistakes or Kumble just becomes incredibly unplayable, batting is not going to be too hard.

A draw would be sad. India has batted beautifully and deserves to win. Especially since Sachin and Ganguly were, essentially, robbed of their hundreds :) (then again, England deserved to win at Lords and that didn&#039;t happen...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Winning this one will not be easy either. Clearly England will not win, but I think a draw is the most likely.</p>
<p>Watching England bat at the end of day three, it was clear that unless the pitch starts to crumble or the batsmen make mistakes or Kumble just becomes incredibly unplayable, batting is not going to be too hard.</p>
<p>A draw would be sad. India has batted beautifully and deserves to win. Especially since Sachin and Ganguly were, essentially, robbed of their hundreds :) (then again, England deserved to win at Lords and that didn&#8217;t happen&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

