<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Musing about music and content and walled gardens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Smoliar</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/comment-page-1/#comment-181450</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Smoliar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/#comment-181450</guid>
		<description>I feel close enough to the music business (professionally speaking) to post this.  Once again it involves invoking the wisdom of Lennie Tristano as a teacher:

http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/28/continuing-to-muse-about-facebook-and-enfranchisement/#comment-180967

One of Lennie&#039;s most-repeated lessons was, &quot;If you are serious about making music, get a day job!&quot;  Throughout his career he wrote well-argued polemics about how commercialization was ruining the practice of jazz (including the experiences of the listeners).  As long as the practice of music (whether it involves composing or performing) is viewed through the lens of the supply chain, Lennie&#039;s advice will endure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel close enough to the music business (professionally speaking) to post this.  Once again it involves invoking the wisdom of Lennie Tristano as a teacher:</p>
<p><a href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/28/continuing-to-muse-about-facebook-and-enfranchisement/#comment-180967" rel="nofollow">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/28/continuing-to-muse-about-facebook-and-enfranchisement/#comment-180967</a></p>
<p>One of Lennie&#8217;s most-repeated lessons was, &#8220;If you are serious about making music, get a day job!&#8221;  Throughout his career he wrote well-argued polemics about how commercialization was ruining the practice of jazz (including the experiences of the listeners).  As long as the practice of music (whether it involves composing or performing) is viewed through the lens of the supply chain, Lennie&#8217;s advice will endure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dodds</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/comment-page-1/#comment-181345</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/#comment-181345</guid>
		<description>I too loathe the content label (both as a consumer and also as someone who has worked in those industries) - but it is the common parlance in the content vs distribution debate. And yes it is a scarcity issue but ultimately a performance only occurs because of a demand for  the &quot;content&quot; which used to command a premium but now does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too loathe the content label (both as a consumer and also as someone who has worked in those industries) &#8211; but it is the common parlance in the content vs distribution debate. And yes it is a scarcity issue but ultimately a performance only occurs because of a demand for  the &#8220;content&#8221; which used to command a premium but now does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/comment-page-1/#comment-181275</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/#comment-181275</guid>
		<description>It goes back to the economics of abundance versus scarcity issue, John. Live performances are scarce and can command a premium. Digital time shifted place shifted performances are two a penny. 

So far I have never heard anyone refer to a live performance as content...for this relief much thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes back to the economics of abundance versus scarcity issue, John. Live performances are scarce and can command a premium. Digital time shifted place shifted performances are two a penny. </p>
<p>So far I have never heard anyone refer to a live performance as content&#8230;for this relief much thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dodds</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/comment-page-1/#comment-181260</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 09:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/#comment-181260</guid>
		<description>Content will always be king, the question is surely how you define that content and crucially who controls it.  Is it the music per se or is it increasingly the music in a live setting (where there is much less of a middleman) that is the valued content?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content will always be king, the question is surely how you define that content and crucially who controls it.  Is it the music per se or is it increasingly the music in a live setting (where there is much less of a middleman) that is the valued content?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Ruiz</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/comment-page-1/#comment-181251</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Ruiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/08/30/musing-about-music-and-content-and-walled-gardens/#comment-181251</guid>
		<description>Dear JP.

In economics, disintermediation is the removal of intermediaries in a supply chain: &quot;cutting out the middleman&quot;. 

The music industry has been affected by the technology every part of the channel by the disintermediation effect.  Today you can produce a reasonable quality record with domestic tools. Once you have the music or content (like an audio book) you can go, instead  through traditional distribution channels, through  the Internet. 

The crisis of the music industry can be read as resistance for reshape traditional channels (and I would say even traditional artist) that were used to receive their royalties sitting home. 

The only link that has not penetrated Internet completely is marketing; e.g. the radio stations. Today most of the music get popularized still by the radio stations although there has been some Internet hits along the past two years.

Disintermediation is responsible for the freedom of the artist from these past oligopolistic market. The down side effect of it is that even though  the artist may gain the same as in the past at the beginning of the career, there will not be no more millionaires as they get nothing for the file sharing malpractices.

Mario Ruiz
@ http://www.oursheet.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear JP.</p>
<p>In economics, disintermediation is the removal of intermediaries in a supply chain: &#8220;cutting out the middleman&#8221;. </p>
<p>The music industry has been affected by the technology every part of the channel by the disintermediation effect.  Today you can produce a reasonable quality record with domestic tools. Once you have the music or content (like an audio book) you can go, instead  through traditional distribution channels, through  the Internet. </p>
<p>The crisis of the music industry can be read as resistance for reshape traditional channels (and I would say even traditional artist) that were used to receive their royalties sitting home. </p>
<p>The only link that has not penetrated Internet completely is marketing; e.g. the radio stations. Today most of the music get popularized still by the radio stations although there has been some Internet hits along the past two years.</p>
<p>Disintermediation is responsible for the freedom of the artist from these past oligopolistic market. The down side effect of it is that even though  the artist may gain the same as in the past at the beginning of the career, there will not be no more millionaires as they get nothing for the file sharing malpractices.</p>
<p>Mario Ruiz<br />
@ <a href="http://www.oursheet.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.oursheet.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

