<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now, what news on the Rialto? A sideways look at social networking sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/12/03/now-what-news-on-the-rialto-a-sideways-look-at-social-networking-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/12/03/now-what-news-on-the-rialto-a-sideways-look-at-social-networking-sites/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david cushman</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/12/03/now-what-news-on-the-rialto-a-sideways-look-at-social-networking-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-236088</link>
		<dc:creator>david cushman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 11:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2007/12/03/now-what-news-on-the-rialto-a-sideways-look-at-social-networking-sites/#comment-236088</guid>
		<description>Hi JP. I&#039;m loving the cluetrain. I get the whole creation of trust thing - the value of ratings and reputations to maintain communities.
My latest confusion is over whether this means that the notion of one-person-one-vote is redundant in a networked world.
I fleshed this out in this post:
http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2007/11/is-one-person-one-vote-redundant-in.html


Would really welcome your  thoughts.
Best dc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JP. I&#8217;m loving the cluetrain. I get the whole creation of trust thing &#8211; the value of ratings and reputations to maintain communities.<br />
My latest confusion is over whether this means that the notion of one-person-one-vote is redundant in a networked world.<br />
I fleshed this out in this post:<br />
<a href="http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2007/11/is-one-person-one-vote-redundant-in.html" rel="nofollow">http://fasterfuture.blogspot.com/2007/11/is-one-person-one-vote-redundant-in.html</a></p>
<p>Would really welcome your  thoughts.<br />
Best dc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

