<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geist der Neuzeit: The Spirit of Modern Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:37:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Sayers</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/comment-page-1/#comment-263935</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Sayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/#comment-263935</guid>
		<description>In a hundred years, people will probably look back at today&#039;s efforts to reinvent commerce in a digital world with some amusement too.

From today&#039;s perspective, the sort of solicitous paternalism practised by Quakers and Fabians a hundred years ago does look patronising and naive. But they were making it up as they went along. It was better than what went before, at any rate.

I am less nostalgic about the Arts and Crafts movement that went along with it - that has just left us with an estate of dark, poky and over-embellished houses and some artwork of dubious merit.

Sean, you are right but you are a Modernist and an iconoclast. I like to think there is room for progress  in the world while still respecting Proverbs 23:10 :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a hundred years, people will probably look back at today&#8217;s efforts to reinvent commerce in a digital world with some amusement too.</p>
<p>From today&#8217;s perspective, the sort of solicitous paternalism practised by Quakers and Fabians a hundred years ago does look patronising and naive. But they were making it up as they went along. It was better than what went before, at any rate.</p>
<p>I am less nostalgic about the Arts and Crafts movement that went along with it &#8211; that has just left us with an estate of dark, poky and over-embellished houses and some artwork of dubious merit.</p>
<p>Sean, you are right but you are a Modernist and an iconoclast. I like to think there is room for progress  in the world while still respecting Proverbs 23:10 :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Freeman</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/comment-page-1/#comment-263661</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/#comment-263661</guid>
		<description>A hundred years ago there was a lot of romantic nonsense talked about the Middle Ages (some of which I&#039;m addicted to), largely a reaction to the worst aspects of the Industrial Revolution. Almost none of the statements in that excerpt are true, or possibly even useful. What we /can/ learn from this material is how bad we all are at understanding the evidence when we have a case to make...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hundred years ago there was a lot of romantic nonsense talked about the Middle Ages (some of which I&#8217;m addicted to), largely a reaction to the worst aspects of the Industrial Revolution. Almost none of the statements in that excerpt are true, or possibly even useful. What we /can/ learn from this material is how bad we all are at understanding the evidence when we have a case to make&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/comment-page-1/#comment-263535</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/#comment-263535</guid>
		<description>:-) differences are what we learn from. Remember this was written a hundred years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:-) differences are what we learn from. Remember this was written a hundred years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/comment-page-1/#comment-263494</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/01/20/geist-der-neuzeit-the-spirit-of-modern-times/#comment-263494</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  I think I&#039;ll probably just let you read this and accept your takeaways;  I know you can&#039;t judge a book by one excerpt but it doesn&#039;t inspire me...I also know that it is often more valuable to read ideas you disagree with (if eloquently and intelligently articulated) but I&#039;m just not sure I could digest very much thinking along the lines that our modern world has much of anything to envy from the Middle Ages.  &quot;Solicitous paternalism?&quot;  Sounds pretty bloody awful to me - downright patronizing...  and btw music, folkarts and handicrafts are going pretty damn well in 21st century-land.  How about &quot;then there was famine, and plague and life-expectancies of 35 years...etc etc&quot;  I have just one word for the concluding sentence of this excerpt...can you guess?  (How about:) Bollocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  I think I&#8217;ll probably just let you read this and accept your takeaways;  I know you can&#8217;t judge a book by one excerpt but it doesn&#8217;t inspire me&#8230;I also know that it is often more valuable to read ideas you disagree with (if eloquently and intelligently articulated) but I&#8217;m just not sure I could digest very much thinking along the lines that our modern world has much of anything to envy from the Middle Ages.  &#8220;Solicitous paternalism?&#8221;  Sounds pretty bloody awful to me &#8211; downright patronizing&#8230;  and btw music, folkarts and handicrafts are going pretty damn well in 21st century-land.  How about &#8220;then there was famine, and plague and life-expectancies of 35 years&#8230;etc etc&#8221;  I have just one word for the concluding sentence of this excerpt&#8230;can you guess?  (How about:) Bollocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

