<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Sunday stroll around innovation and customers and voices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/11/23/a-sunday-stroll-around-innovation-and-customers-and-voices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/11/23/a-sunday-stroll-around-innovation-and-customers-and-voices/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:20:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BDiC &#124; Social Media - Build Community - Increase Business Profits</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/11/23/a-sunday-stroll-around-innovation-and-customers-and-voices/comment-page-1/#comment-448087</link>
		<dc:creator>BDiC &#124; Social Media - Build Community - Increase Business Profits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1441#comment-448087</guid>
		<description>[...] the arrow to hear a welcome messageTake a few minutes, close the door, and read this post: A Sunday stroll around innovation and customers and voices A day earlier, catching up on my tweets, I came across this one from Michael Krigsman, quoting the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the arrow to hear a welcome messageTake a few minutes, close the door, and read this post: A Sunday stroll around innovation and customers and voices A day earlier, catching up on my tweets, I came across this one from Michael Krigsman, quoting the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/11/23/a-sunday-stroll-around-innovation-and-customers-and-voices/comment-page-1/#comment-443982</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1441#comment-443982</guid>
		<description>A friend sent this to me this morning before I headed to work and I&#039;ve been irked all day from it. Innovation can&#039;t be summed up as a business model; yes, recent &quot;innovation&quot; can, but it is not actually innovation. Innovation is the process of improving or creating a new way to do something better than before. Ford innovated the auto industry with the assembly line but it didn&#039;t change the business model it just allowed scalability in it; the constraint here is the speed of production. Edison modified the light bulb so that it could burn longer and more efficiently, not a business model, but again something that produced wider adoption; life-span of the bulb was the constraint. Now we can constrain products to the customers wishes. Innovation is the natural simplification that occurs from constraining the problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend sent this to me this morning before I headed to work and I&#8217;ve been irked all day from it. Innovation can&#8217;t be summed up as a business model; yes, recent &#8220;innovation&#8221; can, but it is not actually innovation. Innovation is the process of improving or creating a new way to do something better than before. Ford innovated the auto industry with the assembly line but it didn&#8217;t change the business model it just allowed scalability in it; the constraint here is the speed of production. Edison modified the light bulb so that it could burn longer and more efficiently, not a business model, but again something that produced wider adoption; life-span of the bulb was the constraint. Now we can constrain products to the customers wishes. Innovation is the natural simplification that occurs from constraining the problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian DE NEEF</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/11/23/a-sunday-stroll-around-innovation-and-customers-and-voices/comment-page-1/#comment-443939</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian DE NEEF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1441#comment-443939</guid>
		<description>This is a great endorsement of customer-centricity, but one should not confuse &quot;the voice of the customer&quot; with Innovation, though.  There is a danger for companies to move from being customer-deaf (or blind) into the other extreme, only delivering what the customer asks for...  Many of today&#039;s products, including some that we use every day, were rather surprising to potential customers when they were 1st introduced!  

Besides, what customers adopt is not necessarily what customers want...  

Furthermore, I would argue (and thus disagree I&#039;m afraid) that Innovation and Invention are not at the same level.  Rather, they are at different levels of a continuum.  Invention is exceptional!  In our practice, we have named and defined these levels as follows: 
1. &#039;Actling&#039; - A simple, easily found and almost standard solution... 
2. &#039;Knowling&#039; - A solution found within the sector or industry 
3. &#039;Borderling&#039; - A solution found in another sector or industry 
4. &#039;Researchling&#039; - A solution found in another discipline of science 
5. Invention - An &#039;invention&#039; is a new, so far inexistent concept/ 
creation 

It appears that it is the Innovation at level 3 and above that constitutes potential competitive advantage.  That is the reason why traditional best practice approaches do not lead to lasting competitive advantage.  Please note that True Invention represents only a fraction of a % of all Innovation... 

The Innovation Process certainly benefits from a conversation. As Randal Moss (American Cancer Society, Futuring &amp; Innovation Center) rightly says, &quot;developing a culture of [conversation] is central to having a culture of innovation and idea sharing&quot; -- Conversations and storytelling are closely linked to KM. All are required for Innovation.  And yes, that probably makes the Innovation... customer-centric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great endorsement of customer-centricity, but one should not confuse &#8220;the voice of the customer&#8221; with Innovation, though.  There is a danger for companies to move from being customer-deaf (or blind) into the other extreme, only delivering what the customer asks for&#8230;  Many of today&#8217;s products, including some that we use every day, were rather surprising to potential customers when they were 1st introduced!  </p>
<p>Besides, what customers adopt is not necessarily what customers want&#8230;  </p>
<p>Furthermore, I would argue (and thus disagree I&#8217;m afraid) that Innovation and Invention are not at the same level.  Rather, they are at different levels of a continuum.  Invention is exceptional!  In our practice, we have named and defined these levels as follows:<br />
1. &#8216;Actling&#8217; &#8211; A simple, easily found and almost standard solution&#8230;<br />
2. &#8216;Knowling&#8217; &#8211; A solution found within the sector or industry<br />
3. &#8216;Borderling&#8217; &#8211; A solution found in another sector or industry<br />
4. &#8216;Researchling&#8217; &#8211; A solution found in another discipline of science<br />
5. Invention &#8211; An &#8216;invention&#8217; is a new, so far inexistent concept/<br />
creation </p>
<p>It appears that it is the Innovation at level 3 and above that constitutes potential competitive advantage.  That is the reason why traditional best practice approaches do not lead to lasting competitive advantage.  Please note that True Invention represents only a fraction of a % of all Innovation&#8230; </p>
<p>The Innovation Process certainly benefits from a conversation. As Randal Moss (American Cancer Society, Futuring &amp; Innovation Center) rightly says, &#8220;developing a culture of [conversation] is central to having a culture of innovation and idea sharing&#8221; &#8212; Conversations and storytelling are closely linked to KM. All are required for Innovation.  And yes, that probably makes the Innovation&#8230; customer-centric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/11/23/a-sunday-stroll-around-innovation-and-customers-and-voices/comment-page-1/#comment-443649</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1441#comment-443649</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jonathan, thanks Anant. I will acquire a copy of the book shortly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jonathan, thanks Anant. I will acquire a copy of the book shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anant</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/11/23/a-sunday-stroll-around-innovation-and-customers-and-voices/comment-page-1/#comment-443640</link>
		<dc:creator>Anant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1441#comment-443640</guid>
		<description>I can well believe that you aren&#039;t doing serious reading on the subject but that somehow everthing in your reading material and in conversations end up connected to the customer in innovation.
There&#039;s a terrific book by Sheldon B Kopp called &quot;The Pickpocket and the Saint&quot;. The title is based on the premise that, when a pickpocket sees a saint, all he sees are pockets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can well believe that you aren&#8217;t doing serious reading on the subject but that somehow everthing in your reading material and in conversations end up connected to the customer in innovation.<br />
There&#8217;s a terrific book by Sheldon B Kopp called &#8220;The Pickpocket and the Saint&#8221;. The title is based on the premise that, when a pickpocket sees a saint, all he sees are pockets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Marks</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/11/23/a-sunday-stroll-around-innovation-and-customers-and-voices/comment-page-1/#comment-443594</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1441#comment-443594</guid>
		<description>Fascinating paths you took this Sunday. Everywhere I move in the broadcast world there is this confusion between innovation and invention. It reminds me of the old Philips slogan- Philips Invents for You, to which some of us retorted - &quot;but you didn&#039;t ask me if I needed it&quot;.  I find large companies become &quot;evil&quot; when they lose their ability to collaborate. I believe Doc Searl&#039;s work with Vendor Relationship Management is so important as we enter the &quot;intention&quot; economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating paths you took this Sunday. Everywhere I move in the broadcast world there is this confusion between innovation and invention. It reminds me of the old Philips slogan- Philips Invents for You, to which some of us retorted &#8211; &#8220;but you didn&#8217;t ask me if I needed it&#8221;.  I find large companies become &#8220;evil&#8221; when they lose their ability to collaborate. I believe Doc Searl&#8217;s work with Vendor Relationship Management is so important as we enter the &#8220;intention&#8221; economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
