<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter from Aristology to Zeuglodont</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:20:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Asymmetric Follow a Core Web 2.0 Pattern &#124; SKY ROCK INDIA</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-472792</link>
		<dc:creator>Asymmetric Follow a Core Web 2.0 Pattern &#124; SKY ROCK INDIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 16:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-472792</guid>
		<description>[...] James Governor wrote a post on asymmetrical follow as a core Web 2.0 pattern earlier this month. I ran across it when JP referenced it in his quest to decide if Twitter is a publishing platform. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] James Governor wrote a post on asymmetrical follow as a core Web 2.0 pattern earlier this month. I ran across it when JP referenced it in his quest to decide if Twitter is a publishing platform. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-461136</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-461136</guid>
		<description>Dom, I didn&#039;t even *notice* that the two of us spelt it differently. Instinctively I went for -qui-, that&#039;s what I remember from Masefield. So I checked Bartlett, which gives the -qui- spelling. See http://www.bartleby.com/265/212.html

My attitude to Google on this question is identical to that of George V towards Bognor (on his deathbed)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dom, I didn&#8217;t even *notice* that the two of us spelt it differently. Instinctively I went for -qui-, that&#8217;s what I remember from Masefield. So I checked Bartlett, which gives the -qui- spelling. See <a href="http://www.bartleby.com/265/212.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bartleby.com/265/212.html</a></p>
<p>My attitude to Google on this question is identical to that of George V towards Bognor (on his deathbed)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Sayers</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-461127</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Sayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-461127</guid>
		<description>Google is divided on the spelling of quinquireme/quinquereme. Even in the context of Masefield&#039;s poem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is divided on the spelling of quinquireme/quinquereme. Even in the context of Masefield&#8217;s poem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-461110</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-461110</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t you get them to play lexulous with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you get them to play lexulous with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-461094</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-461094</guid>
		<description>So that was the other point of the little game you proposed! Today, I finally found a word that hadn&#039;t been used on Twitter. I found it in a journal I&#039;d kept as a ten year old. And I&#039;d forgotten it, so I had to look it up!

It seems my lexicon may have actually shrank in some areas over the years. I used to simply read the dictionary in those days and had a penchant for archaic words. My family used to play scrabble (and other board games) fairly often. Sadly, it&#039;s now difficult to get my brothers to participate in something non-computerized these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that was the other point of the little game you proposed! Today, I finally found a word that hadn&#8217;t been used on Twitter. I found it in a journal I&#8217;d kept as a ten year old. And I&#8217;d forgotten it, so I had to look it up!</p>
<p>It seems my lexicon may have actually shrank in some areas over the years. I used to simply read the dictionary in those days and had a penchant for archaic words. My family used to play scrabble (and other board games) fairly often. Sadly, it&#8217;s now difficult to get my brothers to participate in something non-computerized these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-461065</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-461065</guid>
		<description>Dom, yes it is an empirical description rather than any set of choices or decisions by me. My Bible reading takes me to Nineveh often, but Ophir remains distant. So quinquireme away. [I have actually played biremes and trireme at scrabble]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dom, yes it is an empirical description rather than any set of choices or decisions by me. My Bible reading takes me to Nineveh often, but Ophir remains distant. So quinquireme away. [I have actually played biremes and trireme at scrabble]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Sayers</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-461023</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Sayers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-461023</guid>
		<description>&quot;Quinquereme&quot; is still a sad loss to the Twitterverse. I may start twittering about apes and peacocks just to get it in there.

Interesting description of how you remember words. I suppose this is involuntary? For me, a half-remembered word appears as a sequence of vowels in roughly correct order. No idea why this happens, nor is it a particularly useful way of remembering words. Just how my brain works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Quinquereme&#8221; is still a sad loss to the Twitterverse. I may start twittering about apes and peacocks just to get it in there.</p>
<p>Interesting description of how you remember words. I suppose this is involuntary? For me, a half-remembered word appears as a sequence of vowels in roughly correct order. No idea why this happens, nor is it a particularly useful way of remembering words. Just how my brain works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter as Combinatorics &#124; shmula</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-457377</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter as Combinatorics &#124; shmula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 06:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-457377</guid>
		<description>[...] of simplicity and usefulness.  Lately, @windley (Phil Windley&#8217;s article), @monkchips, and JP have approached Twitter from a more theoretical perspective.  This article is my contribution to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of simplicity and usefulness.  Lately, @windley (Phil Windley&#8217;s article), @monkchips, and JP have approached Twitter from a more theoretical perspective.  This article is my contribution to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwalker</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-456522</link>
		<dc:creator>jwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 05:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-456522</guid>
		<description>Nice. However, I expressed a slightly different take on Twitter here: http://bloglabs.net/blog/15-reasons-twitter-must-die</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. However, I expressed a slightly different take on Twitter here: <a href="http://bloglabs.net/blog/15-reasons-twitter-must-die" rel="nofollow">http://bloglabs.net/blog/15-reasons-twitter-must-die</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2008/12/25/twitter-from-aristology-to-zeuglodont/comment-page-1/#comment-456426</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 20:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=1495#comment-456426</guid>
		<description>@billt it was worse than that, it was the same misspelt word cut and pasted without my glasses on! Corrected, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@billt it was worse than that, it was the same misspelt word cut and pasted without my glasses on! Corrected, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
