<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Neil Young, David Agus and the Social Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/</link>
	<description>a blog about information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:30:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musing lazily about work and play &#8211; confused of calcutta</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-846535</link>
		<dc:creator>Musing lazily about work and play &#8211; confused of calcutta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=2871#comment-846535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] social, as with smart mobile devices, as with the Facebooks and Twitters of this world, the Social Enterprise is no [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] social, as with smart mobile devices, as with the Facebooks and Twitters of this world, the Social Enterprise is no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clive boulton</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-818013</link>
		<dc:creator>clive boulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 04:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=2871#comment-818013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Would the social enterprise be scalable?&quot; 

...Enter #Cassandra, wide rows are not always bad...(Expedia price matrix slide 30) http://slidesha.re/z5Y3o5  

And if Google can, &quot;Deliver each customer a personalized, customer-centric experience&quot;, so can Chatter. http://slidesha.re/yMJa9r]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Would the social enterprise be scalable?&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8230;Enter #Cassandra, wide rows are not always bad&#8230;(Expedia price matrix slide 30) <a href="http://slidesha.re/z5Y3o5" rel="nofollow">http://slidesha.re/z5Y3o5</a>  </p>
<p>And if Google can, &#8220;Deliver each customer a personalized, customer-centric experience&#8221;, so can Chatter. <a href="http://slidesha.re/yMJa9r" rel="nofollow">http://slidesha.re/yMJa9r</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bala</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-817339</link>
		<dc:creator>Bala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=2871#comment-817339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JP, 

  Yet another question. Would the social enterprise be scalable?

   One of the advantages (though it had several other unwanted consequences) of industrialization is it was scalable, businesses built on those models were able to service large set of people simultaneously.

    The question is - while the idea of social enterprise/economies of flow works excellent for a single customer in delivering a personalized, customer-centric experience, Will it work for hundreds or thousands or even more?

     While it does that, will that model also be cost-efficient, profitable and able to grow?. Only then, it will gain adoption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP, </p>
<p>  Yet another question. Would the social enterprise be scalable?</p>
<p>   One of the advantages (though it had several other unwanted consequences) of industrialization is it was scalable, businesses built on those models were able to service large set of people simultaneously.</p>
<p>    The question is &#8211; while the idea of social enterprise/economies of flow works excellent for a single customer in delivering a personalized, customer-centric experience, Will it work for hundreds or thousands or even more?</p>
<p>     While it does that, will that model also be cost-efficient, profitable and able to grow?. Only then, it will gain adoption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bala</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-817325</link>
		<dc:creator>Bala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=2871#comment-817325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi JP,

     Yes, the need of the hour is to move from &#039;economies of scale&#039; thinking that degrades the customer experience to &#039;economies of flow&#039; thinking that primarily revolves around social enterprise. Economies of flow requires people to be collaborative/social to ensure smooth flow of information/tasks across workers/departments. Sounds like a dream! :-). 

     However, the market economy is centered around &#039;economies of scale&#039; - organizations that has the ability to scale will be able to grow. So, For a renaissance to work, we will need changes not just within the enterprise, but outside the ecosystem as well. &#039;Social enterprise ecosystem&#039;?? - may be?

    Well, your post inspired me to write why the architecture function fails in IT?. 

    http://architectsoul.blogspot.com/2012/02/why-enterprise-architecture-is-facing.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi JP,</p>
<p>     Yes, the need of the hour is to move from &#8216;economies of scale&#8217; thinking that degrades the customer experience to &#8216;economies of flow&#8217; thinking that primarily revolves around social enterprise. Economies of flow requires people to be collaborative/social to ensure smooth flow of information/tasks across workers/departments. Sounds like a dream! :-). </p>
<p>     However, the market economy is centered around &#8216;economies of scale&#8217; &#8211; organizations that has the ability to scale will be able to grow. So, For a renaissance to work, we will need changes not just within the enterprise, but outside the ecosystem as well. &#8216;Social enterprise ecosystem&#8217;?? &#8211; may be?</p>
<p>    Well, your post inspired me to write why the architecture function fails in IT?. </p>
<p>    <a href="http://architectsoul.blogspot.com/2012/02/why-enterprise-architecture-is-facing.html" rel="nofollow">http://architectsoul.blogspot.com/2012/02/why-enterprise-architecture-is-facing.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken L</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-816806</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=2871#comment-816806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Clive, excellent objective, but the myriad of parties involved and the &#039;set in concrete&#039; ERP implementations used by a lot of manufacturing co&#039;s make this a huge challenge. Converse may be the exception, but I suspect they are using a similar approach to Benetton regarding customisation, which does little to disturb any existing ERP implementation. But if the customer is happy, who cares how its done.

I believe your vision will arrive sooner rather than later, and much sooner than many traditional companies would prefer. However, I expect innovation in this area to come from new enterprises who can establish more agile manufacturing processes, faster, cheaper and more flexible than any incumbent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clive, excellent objective, but the myriad of parties involved and the &#8216;set in concrete&#8217; ERP implementations used by a lot of manufacturing co&#8217;s make this a huge challenge. Converse may be the exception, but I suspect they are using a similar approach to Benetton regarding customisation, which does little to disturb any existing ERP implementation. But if the customer is happy, who cares how its done.</p>
<p>I believe your vision will arrive sooner rather than later, and much sooner than many traditional companies would prefer. However, I expect innovation in this area to come from new enterprises who can establish more agile manufacturing processes, faster, cheaper and more flexible than any incumbent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clive boulton</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-816796</link>
		<dc:creator>clive boulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=2871#comment-816796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is You Is Or Is You Ain&#039;t My Baby!  

Is Enterprise Is Or Is Enterprise Ain&#039;t Social?

Enterprise connected consumers through polyglot technologies seems ready to co-exist with traditional enterprise resource planning software. 

Customer shops for custom sneakers, factory in Asia, batch size one, the social enterprise?
http://www.converse.com/#/products/shoes/converseOne/scratch/all]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is You Is Or Is You Ain&#8217;t My Baby!  </p>
<p>Is Enterprise Is Or Is Enterprise Ain&#8217;t Social?</p>
<p>Enterprise connected consumers through polyglot technologies seems ready to co-exist with traditional enterprise resource planning software. </p>
<p>Customer shops for custom sneakers, factory in Asia, batch size one, the social enterprise?<br />
<a href="http://www.converse.com/#/products/shoes/converseOne/scratch/all" rel="nofollow">http://www.converse.com/#/products/shoes/converseOne/scratch/all</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken L</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-816678</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=2871#comment-816678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JP, Having had to endure some &#039;interesting&#039; customer service experiences with both BT and Vodafone recently, I strongly endorse your observations about product and service centric processes.  Sugata Mitra would have a lot of fun studying some of these interactions between the process and the customer - they are the best reason for gun control I can imagine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP, Having had to endure some &#8216;interesting&#8217; customer service experiences with both BT and Vodafone recently, I strongly endorse your observations about product and service centric processes.  Sugata Mitra would have a lot of fun studying some of these interactions between the process and the customer &#8211; they are the best reason for gun control I can imagine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberschizo</title>
		<link>http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2012/02/13/neil-young-david-agus-and-the-social-enterprise/comment-page-1/#comment-816326</link>
		<dc:creator>uberschizo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://confusedofcalcutta.com/?p=2871#comment-816326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You use the term &quot;social enterprise&quot; very differently from its more popular use. That is radical as well as confusing. 

Enterprise being people centric-social is very different from enterprise being socialcentric for people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You use the term &#8220;social enterprise&#8221; very differently from its more popular use. That is radical as well as confusing. </p>
<p>Enterprise being people centric-social is very different from enterprise being socialcentric for people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
