Skip to content


Life in Transit: Happy New Year everyone

Life In Transit

Note: My thanks to Orin Zebest for all the photographs, provided via Flickr on a Creative Commons Attribution Licence. Orin, you’re Ze Best. And I’ve left all your original titles in!.

Note: I had some trouble with the photographs when viewed via the permalink. I’ve reloaded each one from a different “source” and with standardised parameters and it seems to work. Let me know if you have any trouble.

2010: The Year of Platforms

I think 2010 is going to be the Year of Platforms. Not Snake-Oil-as-A-Service. Real honest-to-goodness heavy-lifting platforms. The stuff that makes it possible for everyone to have Everything-As-A-Service.

Some of you think that platforms are passe, so 2007. Some of you think that platforms are cloud-cuckoo-land, to be filed alongside the Paperless Office and the Paperless Loo. To my mind there’s something very William Gibson-ish about platforms: the future’s already here, it’s just unevenly distributed.

In 2010, we will see this distribution become more even. We use platforms every day, it’s just not that obvious to us. A credit card is a platform, as Richard Schmalensee and David Evans pointed out so vividly in Paying With Plastic. An airport is a platform. Facebook is a platform, as is Twitter. As is LinkedIn. If you’re using a smartphone to read this, then you’re probably using a platform: both iPhone as well as Android are platforms. If you’re at a desktop and using Firefox and WordPress, as I am, they’re platforms as well. Amazon.com is a platform, as is Force.com. Ribbit, the reason I spend a good deal of time in San Francisco, is a platform. Each with its own ecosystem. Each working with other platforms in a co-opetitive, almost fractal way.

So just what is a platform? A place. A device. A company. An everyday item. Bits of software. All of the above.

When I say “platform” I mean:

  • something that is a foundation, an enabling environment, upon which others can build things, make things
  • something that exists for a specific purpose (or set of purposes), and which invests in capabilities related to those purposes
  • something that then makes it easy for people to use those capabilities
  • something that does all this in a commercial model that facilitates the creation and development of new products, new services, new markets, new marketplaces
  • something that can coexist with other platforms and ecosystems

Humour me for a minute or two. Imagine what would happen if enterprise IT departments started behaving like the platforms that I defined above. A foundation. An enabling environment. Something that exists for a specific set of capabilities, that executes on those capabilities, that makes it easy for people to use those capabilities, that supports the creation and development of new products and services. You know something? I think many boards would be happy to have an IT department that did just that, that behaved like the platforms defined above.

It’s not just about IT departments. It’s about all shared services. Actually it’s about all services. You see, whenever something gets produced and consumed at the point of production, whenever something cannot be inventoried or “bottled”, there is something quintessentially human about the phenomenon. So we have more to learn from biology than we have from physics, something we’re slowly getting better at. Slowly.

Commuter Service

Dinky Service Station

The importance of trust

Service is a human concept. Human beings concern themselves about all sorts of things above and beyond the “fit-for-purpose-ness” of the service. They care about their personal safety and security, about fairness and equality in the environment around them, about simplicity and convenience of use, about many such things. And they care about the exchange of value taking place, what they have to give up, what they gain for it. Humans want to trust the people who provide them with the services, they want to trust the people who provide the platforms underpinning the services.

In a hierarchical world, with deep vertical integration and end-to-end control, this may have seemed easy. In a networked world all this becomes a lot harder, as vertical integration becomes less feasible, as services become more and more “horizontal”, as end-to-end control becomes a nonsense. In such a context, trust becomes more and more important, a point that Chris Brogan makes eloquently in his book Trust Agents. Let me give an example. People can give me a million reasons why Facebook should be considered “closed” and “evil” and whatever else. But to me Facebook is the place where Dave Morin works, where David Recordon works, where Chris Kelly works. They become the face of Facebook to me, and if I trust them I trust Facebook. I cannot do otherwise. It’s the same with Amazon. Every time I meet Werner Vogels I meet Amazon. Trust agents. If I don’t like something I am free to express it; if enough people express themselves similarly then things change. Customer-driven change, built around trust relationships. That’s the way it is nowadays.

Anything that aspires to be a platform needs to engender this trust. So when you look at “platform APIs” don’t be surprised at what they do at their core. They’re usually about a very small number of things:

  • user directories, adding and removing people, grouping and classification
  • identity, authentication and permissioning
  • service and data inventorying, cataloguing and access
  • publishing of things digital
  • distribution of things digital

Safety First

The need for openness and transparency

Much of this is done to satisfy the security, safety, privacy and confidentiality aspects of human needs. It’s not about control. It’s about what people want. Of course the platforms can do this more openly, more effectively. But we have to remember these are pioneering times for open platforms. Marty Cooper made the first mobile phone call in 1973. Tim Berners-Lee wrote his Web paper in 1989. Software-based open multisided platforms are relatively new in comparison, and they will adapt to achieving the trust levels necessary.

Back to the IT department. One of the reasons people distrusted the IT department was the smoke-and-mirrors black-box nature of the beast. What was not expressed clearly was not understood. What was not understood was not trusted. Back to the trust issue. Do what you say you’re going to do. Do it. Prove you did it.

This requires something somewhat alien to the command-and-control nature of the traditional firm. Openness and transparency.

Cutaway Canyon

Verifiability

That’s why you can find open, accessible and extensive documentation on APIs in places like the Facebook Developer Wiki. But it goes further than that, because trust works in daisy chains. So Facebook have to say “policy” things like “You must not use a user’s session key to make an API call on behalf of another user.”. Why? So that their identification, authentication and permissioning is seen to work. And seen to work verifiably.

Another example. This is what Apple has to say as part of the documentation for the iPhone Dev Center, under Fast Launch, Short Use:

The strength of iPhone OS–based devices is their immediacy. A typical user pulls a device out of a pocket or bag and uses it for a few seconds, or maybe a few minutes, before putting it away again. The user might be taking a phone call, looking up a contact, changing the current song, or getting some piece of information during that time.

In iPhone OS, only one foreground application runs at a time. This means that every time the user taps your application’s icon on the Home screen, your application must launch and initialize itself quickly to minimize the delay. If your application takes a long time to launch, the user may be less inclined to use it.

In addition to launching quickly, your application must be prepared to exit quickly too. Whenever the user leaves the context of your application, whether by pressing the Home button or by using a feature that opens content in another application, iPhone OS tells your application to quit. At that time, you need to save any unsaved changes to disk and exit as quickly as possible. If your application takes more than 5 seconds to quit, the system may terminate it outright.

So Apple take care of the user experience through the policies and guidelines of their platform.

As I said before, it’s not just about the IT department, I used them as an example. Every firm is a platform. Why stop at firms? This thing is fractal. Aggregations of firms, entire markets, are platforms.

Even governments are platforms. Platforms that identify, authenticate and permission people to use products and services, that allow them to publish services and data, to subscribe to services and data, in a controlled manner. Platforms that allow people to build new services simply and efficiently, that allow markets to form and be formed.

Yes, governments too are platforms. Something that Tim O’Reilly has been driving for quite some time, and something that the current administration appears to be taking seriously. But open government is no simple matter, even with all the heart and will in place. We use terms like collaboration and teamwork and innovation freely, but making them work in a government context is easier said than done.

Model Engineering Ingenuity

Balancing Buddies

Smaller Than Small

Lumber Mill in Miniature

Small pieces loosely joined

Yesterday my daughter wanted me to buy something from AllPosters,, and when I did I was faced with a variety of payment options. Not just the traditional Visa or Mastercard. But stuff like PayPal and Amazon Payments. Sometime before that I was using InstaPaper to bookmark stuff I wanted to read later, and I watched some stuff on Boxee. In both cases I think I used Facebook Connect. Some of you have heard me speak about using last.fm and audioscrobbler and FoxyTunes and TwittyTunes and Firefox and Twitter in a simple chain before.

It’s where things are going. Sets of small horizontal services doing simple but important things, with the customer having a level of choice at each stage rather than being faced with lock-in. Platforms have to be about choice, no one wants to learn the AOL way again. Walled gardens do a prison make.

It’s not enough to be open, the platforms have to focus on open innovation. As the saying goes, none of us is as smart as all of us. Whatever set we belong to, the aggregate of smart people outside the set will usually overwhelm the aggregate of smart people within the set. Innovation takes place most effectively at the edge where two well-bounded domains meet, and collaboration becomes even more important as a result.

I guess all of this strikes some of you as utopian and rose-tinted and overly optimistic, but I urge you to look for yourself. Think about mail. Think about publishing. About “sharing”. About bookmarking. About paying. About watching. About reading. In a digital context you have choice for every one of these activities. Sure there are dominant market leaders. And sure there is immense resistance to their dominance. Monocultures will not be tolerated, not by the public, not by the regulators, not by the competitors. It’s only a matter of time.

Which means that interoperability and standards become very important.

Shipping Container Junction

Interchange

Switchboard Railyard

Interoperability, standardisation and convergence

It has taken a long time for people to figure out that the data centre and the exchange are like Kipling’s Judy O’Grady and the Colonel’s Lady, sisters under the skin. The very concept of cloud computing, and of cloud services, has been a long time in the making. And we’re going to need a lot of work done to get interoperability right, to get the standards right. And the standards aren’t just about formats and protocols, they’re about the data. Which is why microformats are going to grow in importance, why Linked Data will become critical, why the Web Science Trust set up by Tim Berners-Lee is such an exciting proposition.

As all this takes place, we have to keep reminding ourselves of the biggest change that has taken place as a result of the Web. The power of Us.

Graffiti Yard

Doc's Diner and Saloon

Customer power and rights

Anybody can build a digital bookstore, but they can’t get millions of reviews overnight. Anyone can build a photo site, but not get a bazillion tags overnight. Anyone can build an auction house, but not get millions of buyer and seller ratings. Anyone can build a social network, but not get yottabytes of user-generated content stored with them. In today’s world, 20 million is a public beta and 500 million the table stakes for entry into global marketplaces. People will come where they can deposit their data easily and take it out as easily. They know that they are instrumental in creating value. So initiatives like Doc Searls’ VRM will become very important. [Sometimes people get hung up about the name. Don’t. The concept is important, not the name.]

Warehouse for Mountains

Scale and its implications


As I said before, all this is taking place at scales where we’ve never operated before, or even conceived of operating before. Skype, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, PayPal, they’re all showing us scale in a way we’ve never seen before. But up to now much of the scale has been achieved in some sort of walled garden. That’s going to change. Google. What we’re seeing with OpenSocial and Android is not to be taken lightly, what we’re seeing with Facebook Connect and Amazon Web Services is going to get bigger and bigger.

Platform-based scale has its effects on cost points and price points, on coverage and availability. And the changes have already taken place. It takes nearly nine minutes for light from the sun to reach us. Something similar is happening with platforms. Platforms beget scale. And ecosystems.

IT departments will have a choice. Firms will have a choice. Governments will have a choice. To paraphrase Gandhi, they can be the change they want to see. Or fossilise watching.

Health. Education. Welfare. Communications. Transportation. Welcome to the world of platforms. Or…..

Sidelined

End of The Line

Back to the old IT department. Creating and operating an enabling environment. Handling the directories and catalogues and relationships. In some cases operating Apple-like and “certifying” the applications, in other cases taking a laissez faire approach like Facebook does. Leaving the choice of device to the individual. Letting that individual select the services she wants. Relaxed about the hosting of those services, making that the responsibility of the application provider. Focusing on doing the core things well, in an open multisided marketplace.

So what’s wrong with the picture?

Folds In The Sky

Yup, the sky’s got a fold in it.

If we don’t get the cloud computing environment right, we will hold all this up for a few more years. Which would be a terrible waste. A waste of energy, of scarce resource, of money, of time. Of everything.

Platforms are the way forward. Platforms can and will happen. Platforms are happening. We just have to make sure that the infrastructure for the platforms is done right. Infrastructure in terms of compute cycles, storage and bandwidth. Infrastructure in terms of interoperability protocols, standards and guidelines. Infrastructure in terms of duties and rights and regulations. Infrastructure in terms of sustainability and affordability.

If I had to choose one word for 2010 it would be Stewardship.

Stewardship made possible by open platforms on reliable infrastructure.

Have a great 2010, everyone. Especially if you got this far reading this post.

My thanks again to Orin Zebest for all the photographs, provided via Flickr on a Creative Commons Attribution Licence. Orin, you’re Ze Best.

Posted in Four pillars .


18 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Kurt Kragh Sørensen says

    I cannot see all the pictures. I think something is wrong and I want to see Ze Best :-)

  2. Larry Bruce says

    JP thanks for this post. For the past 2 years I have been working on a Post-Click-Marketing platform with the attributes you describe here. There have been times I thought about changing the model but have stayed the course.

    It’s good to see someone talk in the same circles.

    Happy New Year!
    Larry Bruce (@pcmguy)

  3. JP says

    Thanks for the feedback. Kurt, try going to the homepage rather than the permalink. For some reason the photos are not showing properly on the permalink, and I’m too tired to figure it out this morning. It appears to work fine in Safari but not in Firefox.

  4. Darren Barrenger says

    Thanks JP for a fascinating and thought provoking post. I would be very interested to hear more on your thoughts of governments as platforms. As you know my big interest is in politics and I would love to get your view on the areas where you see the current one in the UK helping or hindering the journey you so eloquently describe.

    Hope 2010 is another great year for you.

    Best wishes
    Darren

  5. Les Murphy says

    Excellent insights. Personally, I dislike the phrase “cloud computing” but again, the name’s not important, the concept is. You certainly get it when you state, “If we don’t get the cloud computing environment right, we will hold all this up for a few more years.” At the worst, we are courting disaster for the very people depending upon and trusting cloud services. Perhaps we might consider changing “Information Technology” to “Information Technology Stewardship” across the board, to better align with the true mission.

  6. Enkay says

    JP,

    Great post. Very insightful. One interesting fact you brought up is ‘trust by association’. I trust Facebook because my friends are on Facebook. Can it be potentially exploited for creating ‘p2p trust platform’ which can be used for transactions like ecommerce. Ebay today uses seller rating system for its consumption i.e. for ebay site only. But perhaps some day it will allow it to become a platform which the sellers can use to prove their ‘trustability’ while selling anywhere….or perhaps someone will create a wiki like rating platform which can be leveraged in any transaction which requires ‘trust factor’. Thanks again and have a great year ahead.

    Best Regards
    Enkay

  7. JP says

    Kurt, the images should now work fine. Rgds

  8. cyberdoyle says

    Stewardship. Yes. Can someone explain all this to whoever is in charge of digital britain, because a good half of the country can’t get access to the cloud. Many have no mobile signal and are still on dial up, which doesn’t work half the time because of very long and very old victorian infrastructure. The brave new world isn’t here yet. thanks.

  9. alexis richardson says

    This may be the year of platforms but IMO this is secondary to something else. IMO this will be a year of User Experience as *some* of the ‘platforms’ that you list make a serious play to ‘own’ the ‘end to end’ customer technology experience. This means: Apple, Google, Microsoft and a few others. 2010 will (IMO) be about consumer and not enterprise IT but some enterprise players will manouevre well to execute on the opportunities that are being created by this market. Those opportunities include real time communication and collaboration, be it video, chat, phone or ‘plain old content’.

  10. WebTechMan says

    WOW JP! This is an awesome article on platforms! I am very excited about the evolution of technology & people that makes this type of thinking possible. This has been a dream of mine for several years. I am a fan of your insights & appreciate your resources here.

    Thanks for sharing,
    Daniel Hudson

  11. Paramendra Bhagat says

    The future is now.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Bookmarks for December 31st through January 1st linked to this post on January 1, 2010

    […] Life in Transit: Happy New Year everyone – confused of calcutta – "Platforms are the way forward. Platforms can and will happen. Platforms are happening. We just have to make sure that the infrastructure for the platforms is done right." […]

  2. Links 1/1/2010: “Avatar” Powered by GNU/Linux, Garmin to Make Android Phone | Boycott Novell linked to this post on January 1, 2010

    […] Life in Transit: Happy New Year everyone I think 2010 is going to be the Year of Platforms. Not Snake-Oil-as-A-Service. Real honest-to-goodness heavy-lifting platforms. The stuff that makes it possible for everyone to have Everything-As-A-Service. […]

  3. jobsworth at 01/01/10 08:48:14 | Exectweets linked to this post on January 1, 2010

    […] the permalink images problem with my Platforms post http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2009/12/31/life-in-transit-happy-new-year-everyone/ jobsworth – Fri 01 Jan 20:48 0 votes previous next Ross RT […]

  4. Insights Delimited By Time » Blog Archive » HNY linked to this post on January 3, 2010

    […] Came across a significant post by JP Rangaswami (Chief Scientist @BT) reckoning 2010 as the Year of the Platform. […]

  5. Ffynnonweb » Blog Archive » Life in Transit: Happy New Year everyone – confused of calcutta linked to this post on January 3, 2010

    […] Life in Transit: Happy New Year everyone – confused of calcutta Category: social media Close Bookmark and Share This Page Save to Browser Favorites / BookmarksAskbackflipblinklistBlogBookmarkBloglinesBlogMarksBlogsvineBuddyMarksBUMPzee!CiteULikeco.mmentsConnoteadel.icio.usDiggdiigoDotNetKicksDropJackdzoneFacebookFarkFavesFeed Me LinksFriendsitefolkd.comFurlGoogleHuggJamespotJeqqKaboodlekirtsylinkaGoGoLinkedInLinksMarkerMa.gnoliaMister WongMixxMySpaceMyWebNetvouzNewsvineoneviewOnlyWirePlugIMPropellerRedditRojoSegnaloShoutwireSimpySlashdotSphereSphinnSpurlSquidooStumbleUponTechnoratiThisNextTwitterWebrideWindows LiveWorlds MoviesYahoo!Email This to a FriendCopy HTML:  If you like this then please subscribe to the RSS Feed or Email Feed.Powered by Bookmarkify™ More » via confusedofcalcutta.com […]

  6. Fluffy Links – Monday January 4th 2010 « Damien Mulley linked to this post on January 4, 2010

    […] Possibly and over-used term at the moment but JP has one of the best posts on what they mean by platforms and the potential of […]

  7. Virtual QuickBooks Multi User Into The Cloud | Lightning Strikes linked to this post on January 15, 2010

    […] up or down as needed. "The very concept of cloud computing, and of cloud services, has been a long time in the making" but the name’s not important, the concept is. Yes, it’s datacenter and Internet based […]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



%d bloggers like this: