Author: JP

I was intrigued by the possibilities that opened up in my mind as a result of reading this story: Captains’ logs yield climate clues: Records kept by Nelson and Cook are shedding light on climate change.

Diaries and journals, both amateur as well as professional, have always been a rich source of historical information.

As we move further into the digital age, the information in such diaries and journals is slowly becoming richer and richer. Meta-information is becoming easier to collect and to embed. Dates and times, places and people, environmental factors of every type.

Thirty years ago, when film was primarily analogue, all we had was frame numberings. Then we had auto date and time, followed by some crude tagging ability. Now, in the digital film world, everything is auto dated and timed and geolocated; everything is easily tagged, and in community as well, with folksonomy.

The same is happening with voice. With sound.

The same is happening with text.

And as a result, the social objects that connect us in conversation are themselves getting enriched and embedded in similar ways: commentaries and reviews, photographs and videos, sights and sounds.

Just musing. Something I’ve been working on for a few years now, yet something where I received a fresh insight by reading that story. So I thought I’d share it. And await comments.

Earlier today, Hugh Macleod tweeted “Funny how Dell is so heavily tied to the GAMING industry, yet as a company it could use a much greater sense of “PLAY”. “Playfulness” etc. He then took the conversation over to his blog, where an interesting commentary ensued, which I shall not try and summarise.

For some reason the entire debate reminded me of a passage in one of my favourite books, Serious Play by Michael Schrage.

In the preface to the book, Schrage has this to say:

Writing Serious Play has turned some of my assumptions and expectations inside out. I came to realize that I had lived my entire professional life under a serious misconception. I had thought of myself as someone who was very good at – and loved to play with – innovative ideas. Give me a clever metaphor, model, simulation, or prototype and I was a cat with a ball of yarn. There was no idea that couldn’t be transformed or unraveled simply by batting it around with the right mix of rigor, curiosity, and playfulness.

But as chapters were reviewed and revised, I was forced to confront some simple truths about what I was doing: I really wasn’t playing with ideas; I was playing with representations of ideas. The notion of talking about “ideas” and “innovations” divorced from the forms that embodied them increasingly struck me as absurd. How I played, how well I played, was overwhelmingly dependent on the nature of those representations. Playing with computer-generated images is as different from playing with spreadsheet software as playing with a football is different from playing with a hockey puck. The nouns shape the verb.

The nouns shape the verb.

When you “play” with something at work, it is the “something” that matters, not the “play”. Don’t get put off by the use of the word “play”, as most people do. For “play” read “experiment, with low cost of failure”.

Provided.

Of course there is a “provided”. Provided you have good feedback loops, that you respond to those feedback loops, and that you take corrective action to prevent recurrence.

Play is serious. Play at work can be even more serious. If you let it.

Talking about feedback loops reminds me of the first time that someone told me about the loser putt. A loser putt has one of two mutually exclusive characteristics:

(a) it is short of the hole, in which case the loserness of the putt is the same as in the “never up, never in” sentiment. You didn’t give the hole a chance.

(b) much worse than (a), it goes beyond the hole. And. You. Turn. Away. The loserness of the putt is caused here by your turning away, and thereby throwing away all the valuable information for your return putt. The valuable information provided by the behaviour of the ball once it passes the hole.

Loved this story in the Onion: Local Idiot to Post Comment On Internet. Some of the bits that had me choking on my camomile:

Mylenek, who rarely in his life has been capable of formulating an idea or opinion worth the amount of oxygen required to express it, went on to guarantee that the text of his comment would be misspelled to the point of incomprehension, that it would defy the laws of both logic and grammar, and that it would allege that several elements of the video are homosexual in nature.

“The result will be an astonishing combination of ignorance, offensiveness, and sheer idiocy,” Mylenek said.

According to the idiot, he will become incensed at the quality and sentiment of the comments already posted below the video—which will include such replies as “not great, nice try tho,” “FIRSTIES!!!” and “wtf?? lol so random.” At this point, Mylenek said, he will feel a deep, unwavering desire to offer a dissenting opinion, which he has hinted will include the words “gay” and “reatrd” [sic].

Go on, read the whole thing. You know you want to. In case you missed it, here’s the link again.

My thanks to Scott Beale of Laughing Squid, whose tweet alerted me to the story.

A week or so ago, I learnt that Dell had filed a patent on “cloud computing.” Today, Sam Johnston informs me that Dell’s Notice of Allowance for Cloud Computing has been cancelled. [Thanks, Sam!]. Incidentally, Sam is worth reading. I “discovered” him while digging around on cloud computing issues, and, serendipitously, found that he has recently taken to following jobsworth at twitter. Which is where I tend to hide.]

The entire incident reminds me of “Sunday Sport” headlines during the 1980s. Nestled between Freddie Starr Ate My Hamster, Aliens Turned My Son Into An Olive and Killer Plant Stalks Queen Mum was my favourite: Double Decker Bus Found on Moon, with a crude image of a bus slapped disproportionately on top of a photo of the moon. Why favourite? Because, next issue, they majored with : Double Decker Bus Disappears From Moon. Aided and abetted by removing said crude image of bus from photo of moon.

At dinner a few days ago, I met someone called Brian Shaler. Interesting guy. Interesting blog. Some interesting points of view, such as his sense of discovering this while at the same time knowing it would be true:

And some interesting perspectives. Literally:

He’s going to go places. Again literally. Brian, we shall meet again.