Apologies for radio silence

You may have noticed that I’ve been somewhat quiet as far as this blog is concerned, just one post since late February. Simple reason. I had a bout of ‘flu at the end of last month, and felt disproportionately tired ever since then. As a result I’ve been trying to do less and sleep more; as the saying goes, trying to act my age rather than my shoe size.

Well, it paid off. I’m back, and rarin’ to go. Brimming with stuff to discuss with you. Stuff you will see over the next week or two.

Thank you for your patience.

Changing my mind

John Martyn’s May You Never is one of my all-time favourite songs. It has everything: melody, lyrics, the warmth and delivery of a brilliant singer-songwriter, and, in my case, fond memories associated with people who aren’t around any more, in places that aren’t the same.

may2318705324_ab1e2a2d43

Some years ago, a friend told me he’d heard a great version of the song sung as a duet. And I wasn’t having any of it. No way. I wanted my nostalgia my way, felt like sending back the OBE I don’t have, or whatever it is people do in protest nowadays.

And then today. There I was, disturbing nobody, quietly listening to the Mamas and the Papas. And tweeting about it. Bad idea. Along came Halley, tweeting away, disturbing my reverie, letting me know she’d found this gem of a video.

2318721014_580de21f86

I was listening to May You Never at the time, so naturally, while dipping my toe into YouTube. I had to look. Only to find this video, containing the duet with Kathy Mattea that I’d heard about and refused to hear.

And this time I heard it. And had to change my mind. What a wonderful treatment. For a wonderful song.

I think I’m going to concentrate on changing my mind a few more times this year. Look to weed out old prejudices with a vengeance. And one of the first things I’m going to do in preparation is to read all the responses to the edge.org question, there are still a few I haven’t finished.

Who needs horror films?

I probably never grew up. I love comedies, even slapstick. I can watch humorous stuff till the cows come home.

And I detest horror. I must have been 20 when I walked out of Damien Omen II and I’ve never been back. Not once. I am not interested in paying money for such an experience.

You find where mp3 music download for mp3 player, Don’t know where download mp3 music for ipod mp3 player.

And yet. I found myself spellbound watching this massacre. And felt that God was in His Heaven and all was well with the world when I watched this response. Yup, some see evolution when they see such videos. I see a divine Creator.

Musing about clouds: More about Web 2.0 in the Enterprise

…..and still somehow it’s cloud illusions I recall….
…..I really don’t know clouds at all….

—————-
Now playing: Joni Mitchell – Both Sides Now
via FoxyTunes

pic10

One of my favourite songs from one of my favourite musicians. I could listen to Joni reading a telephone directory. I would probably pay for it. In fact, if hers was the voice I heard when waiting in one of those interminable call queues, I’d probably be less stressed. I wonder…..

But enough of that. Talk like that will bring on clouds of frustration.

Let me talk about clouds of a different sort: the ones we use to visualise collections and populations and frequency and popularity. You’re bound to have seen them, they’ve been used for a variety of things ranging from tags to search terms to authors.

So far, I’ve seen clouds used for relatively discrete lists, both manual as well as automatic. Where they’ve been automatic, they’ve tended to scrape the contents of a particular data item within a database, such as “author’s name” in a book collection.

Sam Lawrence of Jive Software originally alerted me to IBM’s excellent manyeyes a little while ago, following on from something I’d tweeted re visualisation tools. And so I went there and took a look, and liked what I saw. More recently, as I was following up on something at that site, I was a little taken aback to find myself looking at this:

2283837613_4520d505d7

Whoops. Not what I was expecting, but interesting. And then today I was alerted to the fact that he’d just written this story; all I can say is that Sam’s a brave man. He’s not the first to call me names, and “thought leader” is pretty good as names go….but…. to boil me down to 10 words? In two words, im-possible, to quote a different Sam :-). Take a look at the results, they’re interesting. Chris Brogan also comments on Sam’s post.

And it got me thinking. Wouldn’t it be useful to display the stocks being traded as a cloud rather than just as a ticker feed? Volume would be depicted by the size of the “word”, in this case the name or symbol of the stock. You could use colour and font and style to add further meaning, while still retaining the cloud concept.

What intrigues me further is the more general application of what Sam (thanks, Sam! And say hi to Dawn.) showed us using manyeyes. Applications that get us involved in serious knowledge management; applications like showing the frequency of words in corporate e-mail on a given day, compared against similar word clouds for IM and blog and wiki in the same enterprise. All for the same day. Applications like showing how the frequency of words used in Powerpoint changed over time, to see if the “message” of change was being embedded in corporate-speak. [I shall resist the temptation to say that fourteen times, or however many times it takes….]

When things become digital, many things become possible. When markets become digital, many more things become possible, as my erstwhile colleague Sean keeps reminding me. Sean, who was probably born not that far from where Roberta Joan Anderson was born, albeit a few years later.

Talking about Joni Mitchell, I just love this project of hers: “The Annotated Joni Mitchell” Glossary Project
Just look at what she has to say: “Who cares what I mean? What does it mean to you?” It means a lot to me, especially when she comes up with words like…..

Moons and Junes and Ferris Wheels
The dizzy dancing way you feel
As every fairy tale comes true
I’ve looked at love that way…..

Musing about artificial scarcity

The Because Effect is all about understanding abundances and scarcities. Any firm that truly understands the abundances and the scarcities of a given economic era is bound to prosper, as Gilder noted many years ago.

Opensource is all about The Because Effect, and is a means of making abundant things that were previously scarce. Abundance that is underpinned by licensing models that prevent artificial scarcity.

Which is why this post by David Wallace is worrying; while I’d heard of a few cases over the years, this example brings it home. While I don’t know all the facts, what is clear is that we need to spruce up our capacity to support and protect opensource contributors. Theory is fast moving into practice here. Doc? Don? Any advice for Dave the LifeKludger?

We have a lot to learn about abundance. How to fund it. How to make sure it stays abundant, how to protect the abundance. How to make money from it without reverting to the corruption of lock-in. I am particularly intrigued by Larry Lessig’s work on CC Zero and CC Plus.