Author: JP

There was something different and compelling about Syd Barrett. An exceptional talent who inspired many of the people I still listen to,  a tormented genius. Requiescat In Pace. Shine on You crazy Diamond.

Signs that another proprietary bastion is about to crumble. DejaVu is making inroads as an opensource font family, and adoption is on the uptake. Thanks to Stephen Shankland for the story.

I think this is an important development. It does not matter whether DejaVu “wins” or not, after all it is the community that decides.

What is important is that a cornerstone of the writable web, the “live” web, has begun, finally, to pass out of proprietary hands. And such genies are very hard to push back into the bottle.

I can’t wait to see how Steve Jobs and Apple respond to this, given Steve’s professed passion for calligraphy and fonts.

Here’s the latest figures from OneStat:

Global:

1.	Microsoft IE	83.05%
2.	Mozilla Firefox	12.93%
3.	Apple Safari	1.84%
4.	Opera	1.00%
5.	Netscape	0.16%

 

Interestingly, Germany:

1.	Microsoft IE	55.99%
2.	Mozilla Firefox	39.02%
3.	Opera	2.78%
4.	Apple Safari	1.73%
5.	Netscape	0.30%

 And, UK

 

1.	Microsoft IE	86.23%
2.	Mozilla Firefox	11.65%
3.	Apple Safari	1.30%
4.	Opera	0.53%
5.	Netscape	0.15%

 

Sadly, the stats do not show us what’s really happening in India and China. Or even Russia and Brazil.

I think these stats are a leading indicator of a culture’s willingness and capacity to adopt opensource. Anyone got any stats to back me up?

BTW you can find the rest of the report here.

Of late there’s been more kerfuffle about security implications of The Semantic Web and of Web 2.0. And it makes me wonder.

We spend a lot of money making sure information is buried under at least six foot of concrete, flying a variety of flags of convenience: Privacy; Confidentiality; Secrecy; Competitive Advantage…..
We spend a lot of money then exhuming the buried information, also flying a variety of flags of convenience: Openness and Transparency, Sarbanes-Oxley, Freedom of Information, Right to Personal Data, Disclosure, Eliot Spitzer…..

And the reason why we spend so much money doing all this is that we find the most complicated ways of locking up the information in the first place….

And you know/ it makes me wonder/what’s going on/under the ground/Do you know? Don’t you wonder?
[Crosby, Stills and Nash: Deja Vu]

I’ve been poring over a recent presentation given by Lee Rainie, founding director of the Pew Internet and American Life Project, entitled The New Media Ecology and How It Will Affect Work And Learning. You can follow a link to the pdf here.
I quote from its coda:

I think it is safe to say that those reared in this Information Age, those doing the work of learning and those who need to learn at work are likely to be:

• More self-directed and less dependent on top-down instructions
• Better arrayed to capture new information inputs
• More reliant on feedback and response
• More tied to group outreach and group knowledge
• More open to cross-discipline insights, especially those that form during the creation of “tagged” taxonomies

And

• More oriented towards people being their own individual nodes of production

As a researcher, I see this new world as a fantastically target-rich environment for things to study.

Your role is much more complicated, scary, and exciting. You have the privilege of reacting to and shaping the new environment for these emerging workers.

As the parent of four of these neo-workforce participants, I would only ask you to be brilliant at what you do.

Thank you.

That’s how I feel about Generation M. Privileged at having the opportunity to react and shape the new environment for them. Enjoying the complexity. Slightly scared. Excited.

So thank you, Lee Rainie, whoever you may be. [BTW for the first time in many weeks, I could not use Wikipedia to link to a person’s name, or for that matter to Pew Internet. All I could do was link to an organisation stub for the parent, Pew Research. ]

For those who aren’t familiar with it, the presentation starts with an analogous reference to Elizabeth Eisenstein’s The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe and is itself worth a look.

Rainie also provides us with “ten new communications and media realities”, fodder for the list-hungry:

• Reality 1 is that we’re surrounded by media and communications tools and the bit-flow around us is as available as the air we breathe.
• Reality 2 is that these tools are no longer-place-bound. Not only does this untether Americans from their phones, it also means they can carry a lot of computing power in their pockets.
• Reality 3 is that use of the internet has become the norm in America and broadband connections are the norm amongst internet users.
• Reality 4 is that multi-tasking is a way of like and we live ion a state of “continuous partial attention.”
• Reality 5 is that the rise of these two-way technologies has enabled Americans to become their own publishers, movie makers, artists, song creators, and story tellers.
• Reality 6 is that the online environment is becoming a privileged information and communications space — and that changes expectations and behaviour in the user population. As people gain experience online — and as the online workld itself becomes ever-more-useful — people become more serious in the things they do online.
• Reality 7 is that the mass market is fragmenting and heavy internet users are different kinds of media consumers — and communicators — from lighter users and non-users.
• Reality 8 is that power, influence, and relations between media producers and consumers change in a “prosumer” world.
• Reality 9 is that people’s social networks matter more and more in the “long Tail” world and where personal tagging and taxonomies are commonplace.
• Reality 10 is that everything will change even more dramatically in the years to come as advances continue in computing, communications infrastructure, and storage capacity.

Yes I know we all have read the book, seen the film, bought the T-shirt. But remember that hard data about social software and Generation M is hard to come by, and we should look out for people with the time, the inclination and the funding to get this data. So we need the Pews of this world.

The more we understand about Generation M, the more we can be brilliant in our preparations. Most of them wouldn’t know a Local Loop or a Last Mile if it hit them in the face. And, with a little bit of luck, it shouldn’t matter. That’s what we have to do. Make sure their path is not polluted.