confused of calcutta

I was sad to hear about the death of Alfred Chandler, the professor whose works were instrumental in giving me an understanding of what suits did.
He was described as a business historian, and to an extent it was the title alone that led to my researching his works. I found his writings fascinating, more [...]

[Read more →]

Paul Downey pointed me towards this article:
http://www.healthbolt.net/2007/02/14/26-reasons-what-you-think-is-right-is-wrong/
The graphics, comments and general editorial whatchamacallit make it sufficiently different from the wikipedia entry so as to make your journey worthwhile.

[Read more →]

Liz Strauss, commenting on a recent post of mine, muses about the separation of the information web from the relationship web, one data driven, one social.
You can see her post here:
blogherald.com/2007/05/29/are-you-ready-for-a-whole-new-blog
I’m currently in the midst of moving house and will be without access to thè web for a while, except via blackberry. So my comments [...]

[Read more →]

I was reading Stephen Smoliar’s latest post on The Google Paradigm and its Discontents, and something he said struck me harder than it ever did before, even if he’s said it a million times. Now most regular readers know Stephen by now, he’s one of the most prolific commenters here.  I agree with Stephen about [...]

[Read more →]

A little while ago, I had the opportunity to talk to some people about multi-sided open platforms and their threat to traditional companies; the “traditional companies” I chose to speak about were eBay and Amazon, just to make a point; and I characterised the emergent competitor as follows:

25m participants, already an eighth the size of [...]

[Read more →]

I’ve just finished reading Nicholas Carr’s latest article, The Ignorance of Crowds, in the latest issue of Strategy & Business. (And it’s refreshing to note that Booz Allen Hamilton don’t appear to have constructed the traditional consultant paywall. For this relief much thanks.)
Carr makes a number of points succinctly and eloquently, and peppers them with [...]

[Read more →]

In a post headed Tara and the Blue Monster, Hugh discusses Tara Hunt’s comments on Microsoft’s adoption of the Blue Monster; Tara’s scepticism is something that is shared by many, and she makes a key point:
… it isn’t as simple as GM keeping Tahoe-bashing ads up on their site longer or Microsoft using a cool [...]

[Read more →]

Today’s Evening Standard informs me:
Windfarm owners in the country are used to facing legal challenges and complaints from nearby residents, who claim the ranks of vast windmills are an eyesore. But in Germany — Europe’s biggest user of windpower — it is the windfarms that are suing each other.
At the heart of the complaints is [...]

[Read more →]

Does anyone out there know anything about the various statements purporting to be Ehrlich’s Law? I was researching a German scientist named Ehrlich when I came across this in Wikipedia:
Ehrlich’s Law:  “People pay way too much attention to things that are easily quantified.”
Seemed a perfectly reasonable thing to say, very John Allen Paulos. So I [...]

[Read more →]

Another quote from Abraham Flexner’s “The Usefulness of Useful Knowledge“, the kernel for my earlier post today:
….Thus it becomes obvious that one must be wary in attributing scientific discovery wholly to any one person. Almost every discovery has a long and precarious history. Someone finds a bit here, another a bit there. A third step [...]

[Read more →]