Category: Four pillars

More on bloggers and co-creation and content-free living

Doc picked up on something I’d said earlier, and has provided a number of links to the blogger-as-thinker-and-co-creator space. Well worth a read, with some wonderfully tangential moves.

And all this brings me on to something else. Maybe I’ve got it wrong. Maybe it’s jaded people living jaded lives. But I get the feeling that many people don’t like saying “I agree” or even “I disagree”, much less defending their decision to agree or disagree. This creates a tendency to damn with faint praise, to murmur and snipe rather than to speak out, to take a “the world is my fence and I have every right to sit on it” approach. Wrong, at least in the blogosphere.
Blogs are conversations. Not monologues. It is natural for bloggers to reinforce what is said elsewhere, or to disagree-with-reinforcement, as the ideas develop and enrich and move on. And it is not ego or mutual admiration, but a passion for learning. And improving that learning.

Thinking about blogging: The creative act is not performed by the artist alone

The full quote from Marcel Duchamp is given below:

The creative act is not performed by the artist alone; the spectator brings the work in contact with the external world by deciphering and interpreting its inner qualifications and thus adds his contribution to the creative act.

There is something important in what Duchamp said, something I must understand more clearly. He’s an interesting guy, take a look at what the Wikipedia article says about him:

  • While he is most often associated with the Dada and Surrealism movements, his participation in Surrealism was largely behind the scenes, and after being involved in New York Dada, he barely participated in Paris Dada.
  • Thousands of books and articles attempt to interpret Duchamp’s work and philosophy, but in interviews and his writing Duchamp only added to the mystery. The interpretations interested him as creations of their own, and as reflections of the interpreter.
  • A playful man, Duchamp prodded thought about artistic processes and art marketing, not so much with words, but with actions such as dubbing a urinal art and naming it Fountain, and by “giving up” art to play chess. He produced relatively few artworks, as he quickly moved through the avant-garde rhythms of his time.

If he were alive today he’d probably be called something like RageBoy -)

As far as I can make out, nobody sued Duchamp for doing this to the Mona Lisa:

PicabiaDuchamp-Mona-2.jpg

In keeping with that, I have no hesitation in sharing what RageBoy did to the Scoble/Israel book. Do be careful, people have been known to injure themselves looking at this.

cover-naked-conversations-hacked1.jpg

For those who are interested, it is worth reading Duchamp’s 1957 essay on The Creative Act. Thank you mindwebart3, whoever or whatever you may be, for the link.

Linkers, thinkers and stinkers from a different perspective

Jeremy Ruston of Tiddlywiki (who used to work with me) pointed me towards this Jason Kottke post, referencing Greg Knauss as well.

Between them they go for a referential/experiential split for what I termed linkers/thinkers, and, by inference, define the stinker by leaving him out of the equation altogether. Kottke extends the simile to compare the writer/editor relationship and the musician/DJ relationship.

I think there is a lot of value in what they say. The only bit missing for me, something I have to figure out a way of including, is the co-creation bit.

More than any of the other creator/coordinator pairs described (writer/editor, musician/DJ, experiential/referential), something that makes the blogger stand out is the act of co-creation.

And bloggers recognise that intrinsic difference, so much so that (at least from my experience) the thinker-blogger normally frees up his “content” from the get-go. Why? Because he does not see it as owned or as content.

I think this is important.

La la la I’m not listening….so please read it

You’re right, I’m way too old to claim I’m listening to Andy and the Other One. So I won’t. I just wanted the hook to write about lala. Here’s what Bill Nguyen has to say about it, verbatim from the site:

The founders of ‘la la’, John, Billy, Anselm and I are devout music fans and created the service for the benefit of artists and fellow music fans.

I’m writing this message to encourage you to do right by the artists you enjoy through our service. Despite what is depicted on MTV’s Cribs, a wonderfully entertaining show, most musicians don’t live large with a big house and five cars. Rather, the majority of musicians struggle to make a living from their recordings and must depend on other income producing activities such as performing concerts or selling merchandise.

I’ll be the first to advocate that artists should make a lot more from each CD. ‘la la’ is taking the unprecedented action of giving artists 20% of our revenues from used CDs, no used record store or online site does this today. I’ll also promise to work tirelessly (only sleep four hours a night anyway- this is being written at 3:31 a.m. so pardon my punctuation) to reduce overhead in marketing costs across the industry, so artists can make more from selling their music.

I ask you to do your part by doing the right thing: remove songs from your iPod or PC if you’ve agreed to send the CD to another member.

If you want to listen to that CD again, just add it to your Want List and help us support that artist you can’t get enough of. You’ll have access to plenty of good music to enjoy in the meantime. We’ll make sure of that!

Respect the artists and Karma will be on your side.

Regards,
Bill Nguyen

Wow. Now we are seeing radical business model change. Musicians got zilch from secondary market activity in vinyl, tape or CD, and Bill and gang intend to change that. So you have a secondary market, an exchange, and a gratuitous, previously non-existent, revenue stream for the artists and musicians.

I can see the same thing happen for books, for art, for all kinds of creative activity. Reminds me of my motivation when I tithe my income to my local church, with some unusual parallels.

I have to repeat the Tull Wond’ring Aloud quote: For it’s only the giving that makes you what you are.

I wonder what the traditional critics of the free digital world will make of this. Probably still wandering around saying “does not compute”…..

Anyone out there able to invite me into www.lala.com? The only places I have found that let me wangle an invite then proceed to constrain that invite to US-only, a bit like early gmail. If you do find a way, then please e-mail the invite to [email protected] . Thanks.

Searlsian motion

Nolind Whachell, by commenting on one of my recent posts, started a slew of Searlsian-motion snowballs here; I have no idea where they’re going to end up.

You should take a look at Nolind’s site. I’ve gone ahead and linked to it.

First, Nolind reminded me of a quote from Dave Winer that I’d seen while on holiday, an absolute gem:

You need a village to raise a child, and you need an Internet to fully develop an idea

Second, in keeping with this, how ideas mutate and grow and decay and atrophy and “select”, take a look at what Nolind has to say when introducing the quote, to be found here.

Third, I love this extract from Nolind’s description of his blog:

This journal talks about a myriad of things that may be of interest to me. When one of these subjects I’m talking about gets substantial enough, I’ll create a new journal to cover that subject on its own (like its own separate blog).

It reminds me so much of the ethos behind Amy Jo Kim’s approach to building community and subcommunity, where one underpins and reinforces the other, a sort of fractal existence.